Intimidating witness massachusetts oklahoma divorce laws dating thru divorce
Burgos, the Hearing Officer entered Orders revoking …
Any and all insurance producer licenses issued to Betsy Burgos by the Massachusetts Division of Insurance.
Burgos admitted that she had accessed Safety Insurance’s computer records using “her position as a manager” to access these “computer records showing the witness and victim, Mr. Burgos on the charges she was admitting were true, the Judge entered a finding that there existed sufficient facts to prove that Ms. Iowa District Court Charges Not Upheld On April 11, 2012, Ms.
Mark Adams’ – address and cell phone number and a statement that Mr. Burgos had engaged in witness intimidation and conspiracy to commit the criminal offense of intimidation of a witness in connection with an insurance claim. Burgos’ admission of guilt, the District Court Judge continued the charges for one year to be dismissed upon Ms. Burgos filed a renewal application for her producer license with the Division of Insurance.
Burgos admission, and the Judge’s finding of sufficient facts for a guilty finding of witness intimidation and conspiracy to commit witness intimidation by means of using information she obtained as an insurance agency manager, was “a sufficient basis” for imposing discipline.
Burgos’ admission of sufficient facts to the conspiracy and intimidation of witness charges before the Charlestown District Court and the Hearing Officer’s rulings as to the legal effect of those admissions by Ms.
Burgos: As the Hearing Officer pointed out, and the Division conceded, the documentary evidence from the Iowa state court did not “contain evidence that a pretrial hearing date occurred” on those criminal charges.
The Hearing Officer found that such a lack of proof that an initial pretrial hearing date had ever occurred required her to find against the Division on its charge that Ms.
Certainly Congress insurance had told us to not use the information in any negative way, and I did not then, and do not now, believe my intentions were ever dishonest. Thomas to attempt to intimidate a potential witness to a traffic accident in which her motor vehicle was involved, and she will not be permitted to disavow her guilty pleas to these facts in this enforcement hearing. Burgos argument that “her Charlestown criminal case was dismissed …that she does not have a criminal conviction on her record as a result of the Charlestown criminal charges…” The Hearing Officer acknowledge that Ms.
Burgos correctly stated that the disposition of the criminal cases against her resulted in no criminal record.